Copyright © SynergyWorking
All rights reserved
Author: Alan Parsonage
Allowed with credit for non profit and teaching. .Appropriate attribution must be given.
Content may not be altered.
By providing links to other sites, WordlsApartBiblically or MyKosmosRuah does not guarantee, approve, or endorse the information or products available on these sites.
Contact: & Feedback
(Underscores are present in the e-
An extract from the book ‘God’s Kosmos-
Version: January 2026
God’s Kosmos-
This web site will feature extracts from, and is a preview of, my books;
‘God’s Kosmos-
(The first edition was called ‘Double Constructs and the Kosmos-
and
‘Genesis-
There are many wholly new insights in these books..
Genesis is now unlocked as never before and the Hebrew word ‘qara’ was the key to unlocking it. Once its use is understood Genesis opens up and all of the supposed contradictions disappear, the entire fossil record is explained and the whole of Genesis 1 and 2 are shown to repeatedly testify to God’s plan for the redemption of mankind by the Abrahamic Covenant and through the Lord Jesus Christ. Not only that, but the process reveals that the whole of creation carries the same ‘theme’ in that: the way our world is illuminated; our water cycle; and the size, distribution and type of animal and plant life, also, all testify to Christ.
Amazingly, I can show how even DNA itself carries the Gospel. It really is the case that: ‘…everything was created by Him and for him’ (Colossians 1:16) and ‘…they are they which testify of me’ (John 5:39).
What is the Kosmos-
The Kosmos-
‘It was so’ obvious! (one confirmation of a modified version of Gap Theory)
The KRM will confirm the following interpretation of the use of ‘it was so’ in the KJV of Genesis.
Please note ‘it was so’ comes after the ‘actioning’ (‘God made’) statement in Day 2 (after God made the firmament) in contrast to Days 3, 4 and 6, where it is placed after the ‘command’ statement (‘God said’). I suggest, in Days 3, 4 and 6, Genesis is chronological throughout, meaning the ‘it was so’ statement cannot be a description of God’s command being actioned; it is not actioned until the ‘God made’ statement. Some argue that ‘it was so’ just confirms the authority of what God said, meaning “it was going to be done”. I suggest it is a plain text, literal and obvious confirmation of Gap Theory, referring to life or the Cosmos in the previous creation. In other words, “it used to be that way” (in the first creation). Simultaneously, in the KRM, this describes a status of fallen Man’s spirit, or, actions on Man’s fallen spirit – “it used to be that way”.
To help to confirm this, please note: ‘It was so’ is never used when the word ‘created’ (‘bara’) is used throughout Genesis. Notably, on Day 5, ‘it was so’ is missing. In that day and in Day 6, ‘bara’ is used for Man, whales, birds and some other sea creatures, all of which, I suggest, are not in the original creation (as presented in this book). This is consistent with ‘bara’ meaning a new creation from God and also explains the omission of ‘it was so’ from some other statements on certain days (Genesis 1:20-
In Genesis 1:30 the description of animals as vegetarians is followed by ‘it was so’. So, according to my suggestion, they also were vegetarians (initially) and present in the first creation. But in Verse 29, where Man is also described as vegetarian, ‘it was so’ is not added – why not? I suggest this is because he was not in the first creation. In effect, the use of ‘bara’ or a reference to Man will prohibit the use of ‘it was so’ in the second historical narrative. This is consistent throughout the whole of Genesis 1.
Can you give a different reason for ‘it was so’ being omitted in Verses 26, 28, and 29 and on Day 5?
I boldly state that God’s Kosmos-
Consider this:
What is the Kosmos-
Check out my YouTube
presentations
Proof of God from DNA – short (5 mins)
The interview (64 mins)
The books that end the debate
Atheism, evolution and big bang all must end with this new discovery: the biochemistry and physiology of all life has the same underlying design as Genesis 1 and 2 and hence, must share the same designer.
“I see patterns, I see patterns everywhere and eventually I saw the pattern in Genesis 1 and 2 – repeating sets of four and sets of six with an occasional long-
But here is the thing, if we consider homochirality and the etymology of biochemical compound names then the exact same pattern happens throughout the biochemistry of all life. A demonstrable proof of a shared design and this can only mean a shared designer – the end of atheism really is upon us.”
Alan J Parsonage, the Wirral Peninsular, UK. Jan 2026
(See the link in the navigation bar to “one unifying pattern”.)
Not only does this knowledge confirm a shared design but it opens up Genesis as never realised before.
It becomes clear that, perhaps one of the least popular Genesis interpretations, is the true one and that is: a very specific and precise version of Gap Theory.
Follow the evidence for yourself on this web site, my YouTube presentations and either of the two books above. Young-
I recommend ‘Genesis-
One unifying pattern in Genesis and biochemistry (6 mins)