Hosea 12:10 (KJV)
I have also spoken by the prophets, and I have multiplied visions, and used similitudes, by the ministry of the prophets.
John 5:39 (KJV)
Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me.
1 Corinthians 15:46
Howbeit that was not first which is spiritual, but that which is natural; and afterward that which is spiritual.
The Old Testament is in the New Revealed, the New Testament is in the Old Concealed
2 Corinthians 4:6
For God, who commanded the light to shine out of darkness, hath shined in our hearts, to give the light of the knowledge of the glory of God in the face of Jesus Christ.
***So, Paul the apostle new of a parallelism between shining light on a desolate earth and shining light on man’s fallen heart?***
God Seems to Honour Certain Design Consistencies
Always a Gap (Always testifying of Jesus), Three days later an upgrade
Sew/plant the seed-
The Creation Days Recognise Christ’s 3 days in The Grave
Day 0; darkness and death Day 3 seed bearing life begins. (Seed often linked to the redeemed)
Day 1: Layer 1: Light is ‘let be’: a canvas for the Sun, Moon and stars to display their glory. The electromagnetic spectrum is made/rekindled at this point having different properties (light and darkness)...then a gap of 3 days..
Day 4: Layer 2:Three days after physical light comes to the Earth, the Sun, Moon and stars are made. They display their light. (Become apparent as light is the glory of the stars) (1 Corinthians 15:41) (The spiritual light from God in the spiritual realm is replaced by physical light. The light of day 1-
Day 2: Layer 1:The atmosphere and water are made: a canvas for birds and fish to utter speech …then a gap of 3 days…
Day 5: Layer 2: Fish and birds (possibly others too, see the main essay on this site) are made-
Day 3: Layer 1:Dry ground and plants are made: a canvas for animals and humans to utter speech . ….then a gap of 3 days…
Day 6: Layer 2:Then man and animals are made-
Planet Earth: Originally created as a medium for man to live on. Layer 1 a physical world….then a long gap-
Man is created as a platform to be in the family of and fellowship with God, Jesus and The Holy Spirit-
As God finishes the re-
Genesis 2:1 Thus the heavens and the earth were finished, and all the host of them.
The new life on Earth (kosmos) is finished, so, in similitude the metaphor moves to describing the time when the plan for redemption was completed. The plan for redemption is prophesied in the metaphor within Genesis days 1-
Please note, ‘host ‘may with a dual meaning be referring to angels created in day 4 in the KRM and stars in the literal.
Day 7: As God rests after and sanctifies his created work (sanctifies just created work and rests after both created and made work?) So, in similitude, He also rests from the time the prophesied redemptive plan is finished and sanctifies newly created redeemed spirits after Christ’s resurrection.
Genesis 2:2 And on the seventh day God ended his work which he had made; and he rested on the seventh day from all his work which he had made.
The creation, including life on Earth is completed and God rests so, in similitude God rests after the ‘works’ for the plan for redemption for our redeemed spirit (prophesied in the metaphor) are complete. The ‘rest’ is not the same ‘rest’ as Genesis day 7 but the ‘rest’ described in Hebrews 4:3-
(Hebrews 4:3-
Genesis 2: God summarises the two creations and two remakes of ‘life on Earth’ and our pre-
Genesis 2:4 These are the generations of the heavens and of the earth when they were created, in the day that the LORD God made the earth and the heavens.
The name of ‘God’ in Genesis 1 and 2 changes from God to LORD God in this verse and from then on remains as LORD God. This occurs with the remade life on Earth being completed and it is generally thought to represent a new closer relationship with the creation, so, in similitude, our relationship with God becomes closer and more intimate when we are born again and indwelt with Jesus and The Holy spirit. I suggest, the timing of this statement and name change is significant and unmistakable.
(****A striking similitude which is, I also suggest, even on its own, way beyond chance****). Born again Earth and born again man-
Robin Bullock describes (here) that the plain text name change describes a relationship change moving to one of ‘creation governance’. In similitude, so does the indwelling Holy Spirit and Jesus give our born again spirit guidance (governance).
The sentence describes more than one generation/manifestation of ‘the heavens and Earth’, so, in similitude the text metaphors more than one manifestation of man’s spirit-
Note how this is another before and after salvation double construct, before Adam’s fall his spirit and abode of God being created and after salvation our spirit and ‘abode of God’ being remade. Note also, how the addition of an indwelling within the body of Christ could still class as a creation in addition to the remake as we are a new creation in Christ (a new design). (Emphasis on the ‘in’ Christ) (2 Corinthians 5:17). But the individual is predominantly a rework and so ‘made’ (asah) is appropriate. A consistency throughout Genesis.
Genesis 2 moves to describe God’s (interactive) governance of planet Earth and in similitude, the Bible (later on in the book) describes God’s (interactive) governance of our spirit (Governance: termed by Robyn Bullock-
It is now all about our relationship-
(Day 3 addendum) What life on Earth needs to be born again/grow, so does for our spirit
Genesis 2:5-
God’s Template for Design
An extension of Paul the Apostle’s Metaphor in
KRM
Kosmos-
A prolonged metaphor within Genesis ‘‘typing’ life on Earth with our ‘spirit man’ (living soul)
A stepwise path to salvation
What God does for the regenerated life on Earth he will do for our born again spirit
Genesis 2:7 And the LORD God formed (yatsar) man of the dust of the ground,(the ground being the Holy Spirit-
This is literal as Jesus uses God’s words to make man from the ‘dust of the ground’. So, in similitude as God does for life on Earth (kosmos) so he does for our spirit, this reveals two different types of constituent similitudes:
Salvation is purposed by the Father, accomplished by the Son, and applied by the Holy Spirit. [3]
What God does to renew life on Earth, he will do for our born again spirit
Genesis 2:8: And the LORD God planted a garden eastward in Eden; and there he put the man whom he had formed.
This is literal but also: as God planted a garden and placed man in that Garden of Eden (lEden is described by Kerr as plants imported from Heaven), so, in similitude He also ‘put’ our newly ‘born again’ spirit into the newly ‘planted’ Holy Spirit’s/Jesus’ indwelling package and they are adjacent to each other. (Note: it says Eastern side of Eden for the Garden not actually the whole of Eden). Making Eden maybe a part of man’s own spirit ‘space’ and The Holy Spirit and Jesus and our new ‘born again’ spirit all in this space adjacent to it. Our spirit or part of our spirit placed ‘in’ this indwelling ‘garden’
What Eden (part of life on Earth-
Genesis 2:9 And out of the ground (our spirit acted upon by The Holy Spirit) made the LORD God to grow every tree that is pleasant to the sight, and good for food; the tree of life also in the midst of the garden, and the tree of knowledge of good and evil.
This is literal but also: as God planted and made to grow these trees to become a part of life on Earth, so, He also placed within our spirits, gifts to grow in us that enable us to discern God’s Word (food), gifts us eternal life and a gift of a knowledge of good and evil. The trees again may link to The Holy Spirit/Jesus as in (Genesis 1:11) (Genesis 1:30) The fruit of these trees being spiritual gifts. Please note,, how these grow out of the ground which in the metaphor means our spirit acted upon by The Holy Spirit and now may contain spiritual gifts/constituent from Jesus and The Holy Spirit or our base spirit.
Salvation is purposed by the Father, accomplished by the Son, and applied by the Holy Spirit. [3]
Just An Allegory? The Holy Spirit likes Allegories and they are deemed important throughout the Bible-
Exodus 17:6 Behold, I will stand before thee there upon the rock in Horeb; and thou shalt smite the rock, and there shall come water out of it, that the people may drink. And Moses did so in the sight of the elders of Israel.
Numbers 20:11
And Moses lifted up his hand, and with his rod he smote the rock twice: and the water came out abundantly, and the congregation drank, and their beasts also
The verses describe Moses striking a rock and water flowing out of it and again in the Numbers passage when he was supposed to illicit the same water flow by just speaking to the rock but strikes it instead. God punished Moses severely for this and I believe this is not just because he disobeyed His instructions but also because a metaphor would now, no longer hold.
(1 Corinthians 10:1-
There are allegories throughout the Bible, eg Jesus the Good Shepherd, parables etc, they seem to be a kind of a prolonged metaphor. It would appear that the kosmos-
The word ‘Kosmos’ is used 187 times in the New Testament. See all of them at the bottom of this page (here). In many of the examples ‘kosmos’ appears to be used to refer to our spirit, unsaved spirit or perhaps, the vast ‘sea’ of unsaved and saved spirits. This adds weight to the use of ‘kosmos’ for the ‘ruah’ of man in the KRM. There is an element of ‘kosmos’ alluding to man’s spirit in many common biblical verses too.
1.The concept of the whole of the ‘God’s governance’ follows a ‘seed/wait/harvest’ pattern is from Robin Bullock.here
2.An insight by Stephen E Dill in his book ‘in the beginnings’ here,
3 A quote from an excellent and eloquent summary essay by David Garner of the Gospel coalition. Entitled ‘The Holy Spirit-
4.Term ‘beasts of the field ‘ means ‘outside of’ the Garden of Eden is suggested by Robin Bullock here
********Double Construct (similar) Verses********
There are at least seven (maybe more) double construct verses in Genesis 1 and three more in Genesis 2.
I would define them as ‘adjacent verses or blocks of similar text that slightly differ in detail in the first part to the second-
Within the KRM, the first part/verse often describes what God will do for our salvation (usually a command) and also, often, the pre-
An example of a double construct in day 3 and the staggering amount of information it reveals:.
Genesis 1:11-
And the earth brought forth grass, and herb yielding seed after his kind, and the tree yielding fruit, whose seed was in itself, after his kind: and God saw that it was good. Man will recognise Jesus as a man and God after salvation. After Salvation the Holy Spirit will have given the ‘indwelling package’ to man. Man will be in the family of God. Some men will not be saved.
All of this information for just these two statements about plants. Both statements are literal too, meaning God actually scheduled and designed two creations to testify to Christ by use of these double constructs and the selective use of ‘kinds’, ‘it was so’. ‘It was good’ and other logical extensions. Here is how:
A Study of the use of ‘it was so’, ‘it was good’ and double constructs
‘it was so’-
‘it was good’-
God seems to have certain phrases, words and declarations applied to His Genesis creation and making processes. It is reasonable to assume that these are applied consistently.
If so, these repeating phrases in Genesis 1 provide much prophetic information about the New Testament to come and support Gap Theory and the KRM.
The first verse/part of a ‘double construct’ often starts with God said ‘God said… and the second often starts ‘God made/created…Earth/waters brought forth. For each day except one,God declares that what he saw was ‘good’-
The use of ‘Kind’ (min) supports the KRM and hence Gap Theory
(The use of ‘kind’ reveals more information about ‘it was so’ and ‘it was good’ statements)
‘Kind’ is used to describe organisms brought forth/made/created on days 3, 5 and 6. Each time it is used there are differences in its application between the first (sometimes an) ‘it was so’ statement and the follow up or ‘it was good’ statement. I suggest that these differences clearly define our path to salvation within the KRM and this provides strong support for the KRM and by extension Gap Theory. See why below. (It should be noted that this is based on the KJV).
It is all about before salvation and a step wise path to salvation
***Recap: All ‘it was so’ and ‘it was good’ statements apply literally, but also, in similitude all apply in the KRM but are ‘slanted’ to reveal the effects on our ‘living soul’ in the second ‘it was good’ statement. Before and after a path to salvation by Jesus Christ***
(Note, ‘it was so’ can, in the English at any rate, mean ‘it was carried out’ or ‘it used to be so’ or both simultaneous;y).
Four of a Kind Prove the Metaphor (an impossible coincidence?)
As suggested above. all uses of ‘kind’ in the KRM are, I suggest, the triune God’s exalted ‘kind’-
On day 3, (Genesis 1:11-
On day 5, (Genesis 1:20-
As rivers of water flow out of Eden so rivers of water flow out of the belly of our redeemed spirit -
Genesis 2:10-
And the gold (precious metal/splendour) of that land is good : there is bdellium (bedolah) (a fragrant resin) and the onyx (soham) (precious stones) stone (eben) (the same word as the stones of fire in Ezekiel 28). (Kerr describes the stones of fire as being inside God the Father, so this would mean something similar within our spirit and would satisfy ‘in his image’. Within the KRM. See below.)
And the name of the second river is Gihon: the same is it that compasseth the whole land of Ethiopia.
And the name of the third river is Hiddekel: that is it which goeth toward the east of Assyria. And the fourth river is Euphrates.
And the LORD God took the man, and put him into the garden of Eden to dress it and to keep it.
And the LORD God commanded the man, saying, Of every tree of the garden thou mayest freely eat:
But of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, thou shalt not eat of it: for in the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die.
This is literal but also:
As these rivers flow from Eden and serve it and surrounding areas, so, rivers of living waters flow out of our bellies by The Holy Spirit’s action, the properties of the living water gifts are revealed by the literal meaning of the names of the Rivers: Pison, Gihon, Hiddekel and Euphrates meaning overflowing/increasing, bursting forth, rapid and fruitful respectively.
The actions of the living water are given in the literal meaning of the places they reach.(Literal meanings in brackets)
Pison reaches or encircles Havilah (circle) where there is gold (precious metal/splendour), bedelium and onyx (precious metals and stones). Gihon encapsulates the whole of Kush (black). Hiddekel goes forward or east towards Ashshuwr (a step or an Assyrian}, Euphrates is only described with its name and means fruitful (perhaps an indication of its prime attribute and the prime action action of the Holy Spirit in this metaphor).
lKerr has revealed more about the importance of precious stones within God and also as gifts for us and they seem to have some other value or function as well as aesthetics including radiating light. lKerr has also revealed how the River of Life runs from the throne room of God (and does contain precious stones within it) and so rivers of life coming from out of our bellies is being made in His likeness too. The exact function of precious stone remains a mystery to me though? God gifts a precious stone within us at salvation. l(Kat kerr). The antichrist is thought to be referred to as an Assyrian.
So, with the literal meaning of the destinies and paths of the Eden rivers in mind it may be that the living water that proceeds out of our bellies is intimately related to precious stone ‘gifts’, and encapsulates and separates us from darkness and will confront evil and is always fruitful.
So did Jesus hint at Gap Theory when he said that ‘scripture says living water will flow out of our bellies’ ? (John 7:38) because I can find no scripture that does explicitly say that? However, the metaphor with the rivers of Eden for the Holy Spirit/Jesus does describe it-
Please note the similarities of the ‘typing’ in the metaphor as The Holy Spirit/Jesus are ‘typed’ by ‘water’ and one of the gifts they give us are our living waters. Like for like, waters for waters.
Possible Cardinal anatomy of a born again spirit?-
Within the metaphor, Jesus/the Holy Spirit are planted on the eastern side, of our spirit (‘eastward in Eden), the term used for ‘seas’ (yam) can also be translated as westerly, so our ‘seas’ (filled with Holy Spirit waters?) may be on the west. We know that Jesus’ indwelling is also in the Heaven or ‘firmament’, (day 4) so, ‘up north’. Our spirit comprising what Christ has made for us (all animate life) is in the centre with an overlap of the ground comprising our original spirit from God the Father and our new spirit-
The Judged Creations
Genesis 2
Now a description of God’s Governance
‘It was so’ and ‘it was good’ statements are no longer used, but double constructs still are
A timeless spirit man
Step inside love
Creation Governance-
Salvation as viewed from God’s governance point of view
Two creations & two remakes-
The creation of man is referred to as the ‘beginning of creation’ [2]
and abbreviated as ‘beginning’ (Matt 19:14))
‘Ereb’:
Evening, night, sunset
‘Boqer’
Morning, break of day,, coming daylight, end of night, coming sunrise
More than
just Adam?
Established Translations
Nephesh-
Chayyah-
Hay: live,. life beast
Genesis 1 & 2
What are double constructs?
It’s all about the double constructs-
Which verses are double constructs?
A summary of both creations and both remakes
This page is also available as a series of YouTube presentations-
Genesis 2 Ruah to ruah.
Interactive Governance
1
2
Cattle: large farm animal kept for meat and milk, domesticated
Domesticated: animals brought under human control.
‘Sem’ translation options: name, fame, renown
‘Qara’
Translation:
Call, proclaim
cry, invite, renown
‘Adam’
Translation:
Man , men , Adam
Who did What and Why? Established Roles Reveal Parallels with Man’s Spirit-
The Established Roles ‘Typing’ Roles in man’s Redemption
The allocation of the creative processes in Genesis 1 reflects some of the specific biblically described attributes of God the Father, The Holy Spirit and Jesus Christ. Even though we know Jesus makes everything (John 1:3), The Genesis account seems to, in some cases, deliberately omit this and instead attributes different roles to a specific member of the Trinity.
1 John 1:5: (KJV) This then is the message which we have heard of him, and declare unto you, that God is light, and in him is no darkness at all.
God is described as light and in Genesis 1:3 God declares light to come into being. I suggest that light floods in from the spiritual realm throughout the entire universe. Everything lights up. l(Kat Kerr).
Genesis 1:3: (KJV) And God said, Let there be light: and there was light.
-
John 7:38-
The Holy Spirit is described as imparting spiritual gifts in man including playing a role in making ‘rivers of living water’ flow. The Holy Spirit moves upon the face of the waters in Genesis 1. Moved can also be translated as ‘brooded’ or ‘hovered’. This applies to all the waters some of which are later divided.
Genesis 1:2: And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved (rahap) upon the face of the water.
The Holy Spirit’s location is described in Genesis 1 as being over the face of the waters-
-
John 1:3 (KJV):All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made.
God speaks and the Word makes. l(Kat Kerr), Jesus (The word) is described as making all things and being a physical realm manifestation of God (John 1:3). Thus, Jesus makes all things in the physical realm. God speaking and then God making seems to apply throughout most of Genesis 1 but not all. Why are some aspects of the creation presented as only being carried out by just God commanding/declaring without an apparent follow on God made/created.?
Genesis 1:20-
I suggest that, throughout Genesis 1 when the syntax ‘And God said, Let…. followed by and …’God created/made/’, then the second ‘God created/made’ is always acknowledging The Word’s (Jesus’) role in the process and the first ‘God said’ is God the Father declaring/purposing.
If that is correct, then please note: The Holy Spirit separated the waters but Jesus made the firmament ‘(raqiya)’ to keep some of them in place and also to make a space in the middle of these waters and between the waters and the land. (a dual and slightly different role in the allocation of waters).
God alone said ‘let there be light’ and God alone separated the land mass from the seas. The rest is down to God commanding and the Word using the command to make/create. So, the Word-
Please note: for day 3 (Genesis 1:12) the text just describes God commanding and the Earth bringing forth various plants-
This role allocation makes some similarities immediately apparent with clear parallels for each member of the Trinity and their role in mankind’s salvation:
God the Father lets light shine in Genesis 1 and in similitude shines light in man’s hearts and for man’s path. God the Father separates and provides the land for the canvas on which the (remade in Gap Theory) Earth is made and in similitude God alone provides man’s spirit from within Himself and this is the ‘canvas’ for man’s born again spirit to be re-
God declares and Jesus makes a firmament to separate the waters and hold them in place with a water vapour shield (water canopy) and in similitude the The Holy Spirit and Jesus give man spiritual gifts including living water (John 7 :38).The Holy Spirit provides the ‘brooded’ water and Jesus makes an abode for some of it. Jesus making an abode within waters and adjacent to land -
Jesus makes all the ‘new’ animate life on Earth, the firmament, the Sun, Moon and the stars and all life in the water, on land and in the atmosphere and in similitude Jesus makes man’s spirit new-
As the triune God does for life on planet Earth (a kosmos) they seem to do the same for the saved man’s spirit ?
Kat Kerr does not endorse this web site. You can hear for yourself her revelations on Kat Kerr’s own web sites:
Copyright © SynergyWorking
All rights reserved
Author: Alan Parsonage
Allowed with credit for non profit and teaching. .Appropriate attribution must be given.
Content may not be altered. NB Kat Kerr and other authors must be asked for permission for their own revelation and quotes.
Please note although I have made every effort to be as accurate as possible there may be differences between Kat Kerr’s revelations and my interpretation of them and I advise that you check them out directly.
All Bible quotes and links are from the superb resource Blue Letter Bible here
By providing links to other sites, WordlsApartBiblically does not guarantee, approve, or endorse the information or products available on these sites.
3
And as a summary combined with a Genesis 1 commentary
The Genesis Similitudes and ‘Types’-
A Prolonged Metaphor with Multiple Logical Typing Revealing a Detailed Prophecy of the New Testament to Come
all Within Genesis 1 and 2
(The Majesty of Genesis Reveals the Absolute Majesty of its Inspirer)
I thank
Terry Mortenson for his in depth look at the Hebrew word Adam
‘adam’-
‘ha-
But both can be both depending on the context
A new addition to original version Aug 2022
An extension of Paul the Apostle’s Metaphor in
KRM
Kosmos-
A prolonged metaphor within Genesis with multiple logical ‘‘typing’ of life on Earth with our ‘spirit man’ (living soul)
An extension of Paul the Apostle’s Metaphor in
KRM
Kosmos-
A prolonged metaphor within Genesis ‘‘typing’ life on Earth with our ‘spirit man’ (living soul)
An extension of Paul the Apostle’s Metaphor in
KRM
Kosmos-
A prolonged metaphor within Genesis ‘‘typing’ life on Earth with our ‘spirit man’ (living soul)
An extension of Paul the Apostle’s Metaphor in
KRM
Kosmos-
A prolonged metaphor within Genesis ‘‘typing’ life on Earth with our ‘spirit man’ (living soul)
An extension of Paul the Apostle’s Metaphor in
KRM
Kosmos-
A prolonged metaphor within Genesis ‘‘typing’ life on Earth with our ‘spirit man’ (living soul)
An extension of Paul the Apostle’s Metaphor in
KRM
Kosmos-
A prolonged metaphor within Genesis ‘‘typing’ life on Earth with our ‘spirit man’ (living soul)
Katabole:
Two components:
an element of throwing something down or breaking something up and/or a new foundation.
Kosmos:
What adorns the Earth. The life and culture present on the Earth at that moment. Possibly human society at the moment. What the conditions are on the Earth at that moment. So, we can see modern derivatives of this: Cosmology -
A new addition to original version Sept 2022
The Original Creations
Remaking the Creations
The creation and condition of the original life on Earth in Gap Theory reflect pre-
Genesis 1:1 In the beginning God created the heaven (samayin) and the earth.(eres)
This is literal but also: as a perfect world is created, so, in similitude, God, also, initially created man’s spirit perfect without spot or wrinkle. (Sin free and living in the spirit . ll(Kat Kerr) ). More on the many similarities between pre-
An extension of Paul the Apostle’s Metaphor in
Note the consistency with John 3 in our base spirit having two components and one being water and one spirit
Salvation is purposed by the Father (God said) [3].
-
Day 2:What God has done to renew life Earth, He will do to renew man’s spirit-
Genesis 1:2 .. And the Spirit of God moved (rahap) upon the face of the waters... Genesis 1:6-
This is literal but also: as the Holy Spirit and Jesus provide water for life on Earth, so, Jesus and The Holy Spirit play a dual role in providing living waters for man’s born again spirit. (John 7 :38). The Holy spirit broods on the waters (all the waters, later some in the firmament and some on Earth) and Jesus makes the firmament to hold a ‘separated part’ of the waters in place and a ‘space’ within the waters. so in similitude, The Holy Spirit will have a place within man’s spirit and Jesus will have a ‘different’ space within man’s spirit. A whole new design, perhaps, compared to Adam
Please note , the firmament being called Heaven comes after the ‘it was so’ statement. More below.
Please note, the way the ‘It was so’ comes after the ‘making’ statement here in day 2 and this is different to days 3.4 and 6 where it is placed after the command statement. I suggest in days 3, 4 and 6 that Genesis is chronological throughout meaning the ‘It was so’ statement cannot apply to God’s command being actioned as it is not actioned until the ‘God made’ statement. I suggest, it is a plain text and obvious confirmation of Gap Theory as it is referring to life/the cosmos in the previous creation. ‘It used to be that way’ in the first creation. Note the way ‘it was so’ is never used when the word created (‘bara’) is used throughout Genesis. ‘Bara’ is used for man and whales and possibly some other sea creatures and birds, all of which, I suggest, are not in the original creation. This is consistent with ‘bara’ meaning a new creation from God. And explains the omission of ‘it was so ‘ from some days/statements on certain days. (Genesis 20-
Likewise, animals being vegetarians are described as ’it was so’. So, by extension they were vegetarians in that creation also. But man also does not get the ‘it was so’ added.(Genesis 29-
‘That which is natural and afterward that which is spiritual’, (1 Corinthians 15:46).
Genesis tells us two stories simultaneously-
‘That which is natural and afterward that which is spiritual’, (1 Corinthians 15:46).
Genesis tells us two stories simultaneously-
God the Father spoke-
The Earth brings forward designs ‘held’ within itself (shadows/designs/a memeory from a previous creation) , so, in similitude God brings forth man, Jesus Christ and The Holy Spirit from within Himself (the three in one trinity). See below.
‘The evening and the morning were the third day’-
Salvation is purposed by the Father (the earth brought forth), accomplished by the Son (herb yielding seed), and applied by the Holy Spirit (fruit tree yielding fruit). [3]
This may link with future parables by Jesus: (the mustard seed), (the sower), (weeds amongst wheat), (the leaven) and (the heart of man).
Man a 3 day job? (Based on a revelation by Robin Bullock (here) and this will be discussed later on this page in deatil)
It should be noted that Genesis 2:5-
‘That which is natural and afterward that which is spiritual’, (1 Corinthians 15:46).
Genesis tells us two stories simultaneously-
The evening and the morning were the fourth day-
God spoke and Jesus made.
Salvation is purposed by the Father (God said), accomplished by the Son (God made and a great light) and applied by The Holy Spirit (a great light)[3]
-
Day 5: What Jesus and The Holy Spirit do for new life on Earth They will do for man’s born again spirit
Genesis 1:20-
This is literal with God calling back designs somehow held within the waters (shadows/designs from a previous creation) to produce living creatures in abundance (nephesh chayyah seres). So, in similitude (the waters are typing Jesus and The Holy Spirit) God commands Jesus and The Holy Spirit to bring forth designs from within the ‘nephesh chayyah seres’ of Themselves-
The plain text categories can cover all sea life, insects and birds.
Please note,, the way the ‘moving creature that hath life’ ( a whole living creature) is in verse 20 then in the next verse it juxtaposes to a living creature that moves, as within the metaphor animate life is symbolising man’s spirit-
Please note,also, how the fowl ‘may’ fly above the Earth, I suggest this is a significant word. This is a gift that may or may not be given and may or may not be used. I suggest the ‘may’ is referring to other gifts in addition to salvation. Some may and some may not receive these spiritual gifts. Gifts of the spirit.
Please note, how no ‘kinds’ are mentioned in the first ‘let’ command but all are ‘kinds' in the second. This is explained in detail below. Note the plural of ‘kinds’ with the use of ‘their’ for ‘whales and moving creatures’ but reverting back to singular with the ‘winged fowl’. Plural in the metaphor is, I suggest, referring to both Jesus and The Holy Spirit and singular when referring to just The Holy Spirit-
This is literal with the waters bringing forth designs held (a shadow/design from a previous creation) within the water, known designs being called back but by partial use of the words created/brought forth, some designs are modified, some are so changed as as to be whole new designs and some are unchanged. (the text allows for just ‘brought forth’ too) See the main essay.
Please note the way the reference is ‘every’ living creature this is consistent with Kerr’s revelation that our Holy Spirit and Jesus’ indwellings are a ‘whole’ of them. (A thumbnail?)
On the third day Jesus rose again giving us an abundant eternal life, in reverence to this 3 days after the atmosphere and seas were made then they too were populated with an abundant higher life of fish and birds.
Please note, how it is now waters (and not seas). Seas, I suggest, is an allusion to the part of our own spiritual waters enhanced by The Holy Spirit, so the waters brought forth many creatures in abundance (nephesh chayyah seres)-
Established Translations
Nephesh-
Chayyah-
Seres-
Min-
An excellent summary of ‘nephesh chay ‘ meaning by David Pitman (here)
Gap Theory confirmation verses-
Gap Theory confirmation verses-
‘That which is natural and afterward that which is spiritual’, (1 Corinthians 15:46).
Genesis tells us two stories simultaneously-
all point to the KRM. Much more detail below.
God (the Father) spoke and Jesus (God created and made) The Holy Spirit (the waters) brought forth.
The waters bring forward designs ‘held’ within them (a shadow/design from the previous creation) so, The Holy Spirit and Jesus Christ bring forth attributes and traits from within themselves as gifts to form our new spirit. Nephesh chayyah both.
Our spirit and soul anatomy/constituents are thus ‘in his image’.
Salvation is purposed by the Father (God spoke), accomplished by the Son ,(God made/created and applied by the Holy Spirit (the waters brought forth and ‘of the air’)[3]
-
Day 6: What God the Father does for new life on Earth He will do for our born again spirit
Genesis 1:24-
And God made the beast of the earth after his kind, and cattle (behema) after their kind, and every thing that creepeth upon the earth after his kind: and God saw that it was good.
This is literal but also:
On the third day Jesus was resurrected giving us a more abundant and eternal life, so, on day 3 in the creation account the land that was made to yield vegetation can now, 3 days later have a higher creation of man and nephesh chayyah animals.
As the Earth brought forth the living creature kinds (nephesh chayyah min) with designs somehow held within the Earth (shadows/designs from a previous creation), so, the Earth ‘types’ God the Father who brings forth our spirit (nephesh chayyah min) from within Himself (the lights of James 1:17 originally ‘wrought’ as a copy/part of his own design/constituents (nephesh chayyah)). These, He dispatches to us or breathed into Adam to make the spirit component of man.
(Genesis 2:7) (James 1:17) (Psalm 139:15) (Psalm 104:30) (Psalm 139:13-
This being consistent with the spirit component of ‘In his image’-
Gap Theory confirmation verses-
Man a 3-
Established Translations
Nephesh-
Chayyah-
Seres-
Min-
An excellent summary of ‘nephesh chay ‘ meaning by David Pitman (here)
Cattle: large farm domesticated animal kept for meat and milk
Domesticated: animals brought under human control and shelter
Gifts from God The Father-
lKerr describes God The Father giving us all manner of gifts/talents-
‘That which is natural and afterward that which is spiritual’, (1 Corinthians 15:46).
Genesis tells us two stories simultaneously-
God spoke and Jesus made.
Salvation is purposed by the Father (God said), accomplished by the Son (God made)[3]
Three days in the making Adam’s body and our redeemed spirit
Although controversial, I subscribe to the view that Robin Bullock points out (here) that God placed the spirits of both Adam and Eve into Adam’s (as well as ‘knowledge’ of other animals) spirit and on day 6 but made his body and placed his indwelling in him on day 3. More on this when we get to the Genesis 2 account below. But for now:
Genesis 1:28 And God blessed them, and God said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue it: and have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over every living thing that moveth upon the earth.
This is literal as man is commanded to be fruitful, multiply, replenish the Earth and have dominion over every living thing, so, in similitude mans’s redeemed spirit is commanded to be fruitful and multiply (help in the salvation of others), replenish (our spirit made from God the Father made formless and void by the fall/sin). This command confirmed in (Colossians 1:10) (John 15:16). As man will literally have dominion over all the fish of the sea (metaphorically-
Please note: As described above, these gifts are all Holy Spirit originated gifts (i.e. from day 5-
Please note how in the first sentence (verse 26) man will have dominion over fish, fowl, cattle, all the Earth and all that creepeth but in the follow up sentence verse 28, cattle; and ‘all the earth’ are omitted. Again more on this to follow.
Please note, ‘fowls of the air’ has replaced ‘winged fowl’ from day 5 and is still all flying birds/insects in the literal but may now include angels as well as Holy Spirit gifts in the KRM.
Genesis 1:29 And God said, Behold, I have given you every herb bearing seed, which is upon the face of all the earth, and every tree, in the which is the fruit of a tree yielding seed; to you it shall be for meat (akla)
This is literal and describes how man will be a vegetarian, so, in similitude, it will describe what man’s spirit ‘man’ needs for ‘food’ also. Note how the grass of (Genesis 1:12-
Food for both creations
The condition of the judged life on Earth in Gap Theory reflects man’s judged spirit
Genesis 1:2 …the earth was without form (tohu), and void (bohu) and darkness was upon the face of the deep (tehom)…
This is literal but also: as the surface of the first creation on Earth and all life on that Earth falls into a satanically induced judgment of death and darkness, so, in similitude, Adam’s spirit has a satanically induced fall, dies and is judged-
Please note, the creation is completed/finished, as ‘created’ is in the past tense.
Please note the way God does not say there is a long time gap between Genesis 1:1 and 1:2, which Gap Theory demands. Here is why:
‘That which is natural and afterward that which is spiritual’, (1 Corinthians 15:46).
Genesis tells us two stories simultaneously-
The Holy Spirit/Jesus and Eden
‘God said… God made’
=
God the Father said….The Word (Jesus) made
(Througho-
‘Genesis tells us two stories simultaneo-
Remaking Life on Earth
Remaking man’s fallen spirit
Gap Theory confirmation Because the whole of Genesis 1 and 2 are within this metaphor, it means the references to our spirit before and after man’s fall must also have a previously created and fallen world too
A beautifully crafted passage
‘That which is natural and afterward that which is spiritual’, (1 Corinthians 15:46).The text is slanted to reveal much New Testament doctrine. I suggest there would be easier ways to describe man as a vegetarian than this, its all about the second meaning?
Salvation is purposed by the Father, accomplished by the Son (He made the seed bearers ) and applied by the Holy Spirit (with fruit of fruit trees the triune God have made). [3]
Genesis 1:30 And to every beast of the earth, and to every fowl of the air, and to every thing that creepeth upon the earth, wherein there is life, I have given every green herb for meat: and it was so .
Please note, I believe the selective omission of the grasses and trees of the similar (Genesis 1:12-
This is literal, as all the the categories can represent all animal life (nephesh chayyah life) and they will all be vegetarian, but also, in similitude, all within the metaphor represent different gifts/works/attributes. ‘Beast of the Earth’-
Salvation achieved by Jesus and applied by The Holy Spirit, not man. This verse confirms this application. The ‘it was so’ referring to the the green herb-
Please note, there are 4 things described in Genesis 1:30-
Please note that with the use of ‘every’ within the text could be referring simultaneously ‘beasts of the earth’ in man and from God the Father, also, ‘fowls of the air’, in man and from The Holy Spirit so both working on the unsaved man at the same time. Also, the use of ‘every’ for ‘herbs’(man) could mean every single man is ‘approached’ and this could contradict the TULIP ‘elect only approached’ doctrine. (Which is my stance)
The Indwellings prophesied, described and revealed
The Strange Syntax-
‘That which is natural and afterward that which is spiritual’, (1 Corinthians 15:46).The text is slanted to reveal much New Testament doctrine.
As previously mentioned when the slanting of the text for the metaphor within Genesis 1 is established then it becomes apparent that Genesis 2 does exactly the same. In fact, this author has found that Genesis becomes much easier to understand in both chapters once the metaphor Is grasped. It seems to flow much smoother. The metaphor seemingly making the literal more understandable.
All of this ‘slanting’ seems a bit unusual otherwise. ‘A fruit tree yielding fruit whose seed is in itself’ seems a strange term? What actually is such a tree? Although, I believe there are literally such trees brought forth on day 3 (Aren’t all trees in this category anyway?). The unusual wording seems to make more sense in the metaphor.
The strange omission of certain foodstuffs from Genesis 29-
Likewise, the whole Idea of the strange rivers in Genesis 2 (that seem to have an unusual river source and start as full rivers and split into 4) and their pathways to areas of precious stones/metals and different destinations seems a strange inclusion. What has that got to do with anything? But with the metaphor of The Holy Spirit and the Garden of Eden it almost appears that this is the prime reason for their inclusion too. (I suspect there is much more to these rivers). The metaphor answers why God apparently placed man in the garden of Eden twice? Why he used the word ‘help meet’ to start with then changed it to woman and wife?
Why was Eden ‘made to grow’ and not just fully formed plants as per the rest of the creation? The KRM answers all of these and more.
Why do waters and land bring forth creatures why not just say they were created or made? The subtle change from ‘beasts’ of the ‘earth’ to ‘field’. The elegant dual use of ‘nephesh chayyah’ and the omission or addition of certain words in the follow up action description after the command. The use of established double meanings all backed up elsewhere in scripture.The selective use ‘it was so’ and ‘it was good’ statements, all to me point to an underlying remez and truly amazing craft in deliverering it
All point to the KRM and Gap theory and all testify of Jesus Christ-
Juggling and Juxtapositioning of Kosmoses (see The Foundation of the World on this site here)
There are ties between the Genesis 1 and Genesis 2 account of creation with the term ‘The Foundation of the World’ (FOTW) (a translation of ‘katabole kosmos’ see in the margin opposite)-
See the ‘Foundation of the World’ and ‘eons of no time’ on this site for these in more detail.(here).and (here).
All three events are breaking down and re-
There really are not words to describe how big our God is or the majesty and beauty of His inexhaustible scripture.
The Bible and Light
The Bible has several meanings to the word light (both figuratively and literally): e.g. light as opposed to darkness or righteousness and goodness or a ‘light of life’, and others summarised (here). But also, I suggest another less considered option should be born in mind-
The evidence for a prolonged metaphor is overwhelming and all point to Gap Theory! So, God carried out two staggeringly beautiful creations and all scheduled and designed with the redemptive plan and Jesus’ role in mind? Awesome and some.
Every single verse in Genesis 1 and most of Genesis 2 describe our redemption and much of the New Testament. Working in reverse to this essay-
Oh, how I wish the Christian Community would unite around Gap Theory! The collapse of the theory of evolution would, I think, very soon follow.
I cringe when I hear ‘young earthers’ try and explain why there are no human fossils before the Cenozoic, likewise, when ‘theistic evolutionists’ and ‘day agers’ juggle and stretch the Genesis 6 day order of things and avoidance of the obvious meaning of ‘yom’. The non-
***Jesus Himself confirms Gap Theory and Gap Theory reveals the KRM which testifies of The Lord Jesus Christ***
This is how this logical ‘typing’ seems to work out -
This might seem complicated but once you go through it, it will be quite easy to understand.-
Born again life on Earth, born again man. There is astonishing detail in this metaphor.
God can only use the ‘vocabulary of that day’s work’ to tell the ‘second story’ of our salvation. What God makes on each individual day will define how He can describe man’s salivation. For example, in day 3, He will categorise plants in a certain way, in day 4 He defines the sun and moon deliberately ambiguously as ‘lights’. In day 5 He will use words that categorise fish and birds to tie in (‘and type’) with the nature of man’s indwelling and born again spirit ‘anatomy, biochemistry and physiology’. Likewise on day 6 for animals: This leads to multiple logical ‘typing’ that is consistently used throughout Genesis 1 and 2 and maybe beyond that too:
You are about to discover how life on Earth parallels the spirit throughout the whole of Genesis 1 and 2 .You are about to discover how the enormity of Adam’s original spiritual gifts may well parallel the size and stature of life on the previous Earth. As life on Earth was huge with dinosaurs and trees being hundreds of feet tall, then so were Adam’s pre-
Day 4: What God does to renew life on Earth he will do to renew our born again spirit
Genesis 1:14-
And God made two great (gadol) lights; the greater light to rule the day, and the lesser light to rule the night: he made the stars also. And God set them in the firmament of the heaven to give light upon the Earth And to rule over the day and over the night, and to divide the light from the darkness: and God saw that it was good.
This is literal with God ‘switching’ back on all the stars and our Sun, but also;
God gave his son and on the third day, when Jesus, the light of the world rose again to glorify mankind (Romans 8: 29-
You are typed by what you make in the KRM and as Jesus made the Sun, Moon and stars to shine light on Earth-
(John 1:4) (John 8:12) (Ephesians 5:8-
Please note, the way the word for great (gadol) is the same in this verse as Genesis 1:20 ‘great whales’-
Please note, I do not think the lesser light is the indwelling Holy Spirit in totality as He could not be described as ‘lesser’. The lesser light-
There is revelation that God may have created more angels at this time? (Robin Bullock about 34 mins in (here)). ‘He made the stars also’ although literal in the plain text, may allude to this in the KRM as stars are sometimes metaphored with angels notably in (Revelation 12:4).
Recap: I suggested that the ‘smaller’ creatures brought forth may be more like ‘components’ of our spirit and the larger creatures ‘larger’ gifts/works/attributes/skills as per the initial key.
God spoke Jesus made. The Earth brings forward designs ‘held’ within it (shadows/designs from the previous creation), so, God the Father brings forth our spirit (light for light and like for like) with its added gifts from within Himself and also brings forth Jesus’ and The Holy Spirit’s ‘nephesh chayyah’. (From within the Triune God).
Salvation is purposed by the Father (God said), accomplished by the Son (God made), and applied by the Holy Spirit. ( One of the cattle and some of the creeping things) [3]
Genesis 1:26: And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth. So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them
This is literal but also:
On the third day Jesus rose, and provided a mechanism for man to be born again (and have a new ‘higher’ creation inside man himself), so, in reverence, 3 days after vegetation is introduced, life on planet Earth gets a higher creation in spirit containing animals/man.
The evening and the morning were the sixth day-
The New Testament confirms 6 different ‘types’ of relationship between God and Man and all are mentioned in Genesis 2?
John 14:17 Even the Spirit of truth; whom the world cannot receive, because it seeth him not, neither knoweth him: but ye know him; for he dwelleth with you, and shall be in you.
1 John 4:13 Hereby know we that we dwell in him, and he in us, because he hath given us of his Spirit:
The Holy spirit: in us, us in Him-
2 Corinthians 13:5 Examine yourselves, whether ye be in the faith; prove your own selves. Know ye not your own selves, how that Jesus Christ is in you, except ye be reprobates?
Colossians 1 28 Whom we preach, warning every man, and teaching every man in all wisdom; that we may present every man perfect in Christ Jesus
Jesus In us, and us in Him-
Ephesians 5:30 For we are members of his body, of his flesh, and of his bones
Revelation 19:7 Let us be glad and rejoice, and give honour to him: for the marriage of the Lamb is come, and his wife hath made herself ready
Christians as one body in Christ and a bride of Christ, (Genesis 2:21-
Ruah to Ruah-
Please note the text seems to describe God asking for two ‘help meets’ for Adam as well ;
Genesis 2 2:18 I will make him an help meet for him and then after making selected animals the text seems to say ‘there was (still) not found an help meet for him.’ (I think using the term ‘help meet’ and not wife/bride is for the metaphor as in the metaphor (which I believe is here referring to the (whole) indwellings of Jesus and The Holy Spirit,) they cannot be referred to as wife/bride. Whereas ‘help meet’ is a broader term. Later in Genesis 2; 22 once the ‘indwellings are established, the ‘help meet’ can be referred to as a bride (of Christ) the word woman ( a subset of help meet) is used as this ‘works’ within this metaphor and in the literal.
In the literal, God is declaring man is alone so he needs this ‘help meet’ and then makes some selective animals which do not seem to satisfy this need as ‘a helpmeet is not found’. So ,within this metaphor God (the terminology within the metaphor seems to make more logical sense than the literal), declares man being alone and needing company, so, God makes an indwelling of Jesus and The Holy Spirit (this time the indwellings in man and not man in Jesus and not man in the Holy Spirit as previous. So, in Genesis 2 :19 God uses ‘the beasts of the field’ (the original spirit constituents given to us by God the Father and possibly changed by Jesus), the ‘fowl of the air’ ( the Holy Spirit presented gifts of salvation-
This first request for an ‘help meet’ leading to the two divine indwellings to satisfy man’s loneliness.
It seems to not be enough as God declares Adam still needs a ‘help meet’. In the literal God makes a deep sleep fall on Adam and he has a wound to his side and ‘builds’ (bana) a bride who God presents to Adam. Adam also gave Eve a spirit at this point. (Robin Bullock) So, in similitude Jesus dies -
The prolonged metaphor with multiple logical ‘typing’ revealing much new testament doctrine on the nature of the indwellings.
More Scripture comparisons to confirm these points
Genesis 22-
(To repeat: how Jesus’ body leaked blood and clear fluid-
And Adam said, This is now bone of my bones, and flesh of my flesh: she shall be called Woman, because she was taken out of Man. In similitude the same terminology with (Ephesians 5:30-
Therefore shall a man leave his father and his mother, and shall cleave unto his wife: and they shall be one flesh. In similitude, therefor, shall Jesus leave Joseph and Mary and cling to his bride.
Instructions on what to eat and how to behave?
Note:No ‘it was so’ statements with man (or any created beings)
This text kind of confirms the KRM beyond any doubt!
How can the whole text be slanted towards a second meaning by accident?
A God of wild goose chases?
Did God not see it? impossible.
It has to be true?
A slight theological side issue discussion
One add one equals one here
A timeless spirit man
Step inside love
The ‘His kind’ in Genesis is of the triune God-
The plural ‘their kind’ is always Jesus and The Holy Spirit ‘kind’
What does ‘it was so’ actually mean?
*As described above the ‘It was so’ comes before the ‘God made/earth brought forth’ statement, in days 3,4, and 6, but not in day 2, in day 2 it comes after the ‘God made’. I suggest that Genesis is chronological throughout, so the ‘It was so’ statement cannot just apply to God’s command being actioned (it was so) as it is not actioned until the God made statement but the ‘it was so’ comes after the ‘God made’ in day 2 for reasons as described above. Some argue that the use of ‘it was so’ is just confirming God’s command as being issued. I suggest, the ‘it was so’ has a different, plain text and obvious meaning. I suggest it is a confirmation of Gap Theory as it is referring to life or the cosmos in the previous creation. ‘It used to be that way’ (in the first creation). Note the way ‘it was so’ is never used when the word created (‘bara’) is used. ‘Bara’ is used for man and whales (and some other sea creatures and birds), all of which are not in the original creation in Gap Theory as described on this site. So, they cannot be ‘it was so’ as they were not there. This is consistent with ‘bara’ meaning a new creation from God. And explains the omission of ‘it was so’ from some days or from a part of some day’s statements. (Genesis 20-
So, we can see that animals are described as being vegetarians and also used to be in the first creation, so are described ’it was so’ whereas. man is also described as being vegetarian, but now only and not previously because he was not there in the first creation and so does not get the ‘it was so’ added.(Genesis 29-
What was the first world like then?
In effect ‘it was so’ becomes a description of what the first creation was like. If we study (day 4) and its use of ‘it was so’ and note the differences between the ‘it was so’ statement and the ‘it was good’, it does seem to confirm Kat Kerr’s revelations that there is no Sun or Moon shining light on Earth in the first creation. God’s ‘it was so’ in day 4 asks for lights in the firmament-
It may also be that with the use of the word ‘cattle’ in day 5 under an ‘it was so’ statement means that the inhabitants of this first creation (angels not humans!) had domesticated animals (pets and not to eat!) along with their cities described in Jeremiah 4:26.What a work of beauty! Two simultaneous narratives!
More on what ‘it was so’ reveals about the first creation (here)
Day 7: What relationship exists with God and life on Earth also exists for God and our redeemed spirit, -
Genesis 2:3 And God blessed the seventh day, and sanctified it: because that ***in*** it he had rested from all his work which God created and made.
This is no longer a decree of what will happen in the creation but now addresses when the creation is complete and, in similitude, describes what happens to our spirit when the prophesied plan for redemption is completed and actioned, as God sanctifies the newly created part of the creation, so, he sanctifies our newly born spirit. (2 Corinthians 5:17) (Hebrews 13 12)
God is now ‘in’ the creation as he walks with Adam and they fellowship together and He sanctifies this newly created life on Earth, so in similitude, God is ‘in’ our spirit with the presence of the indwelling Holy Spirit and Jesus within man-
Another double construct Genesis 2:2-
Genesis 2:2 And on the seventh day God ended his work which he had made; and he rested on the seventh day from all his work which he had made.
Genesis 2:3 And God blessed the seventh day, and sanctified it: because that ***in*** it he had rested from all his work which God created and made.
Genesis 2:2 (Before salvation) as God rests after his 6 days of work, so, in similitude God rests from his work of the redemptive plan after The Abrahamic Covenant (above). We could enter into this rest
Genesis 2:3 (After salvation), God rests from his work but now also sanctifies our new creation in Christ and is ***in*** this rest with us (by the indwellings). We can enter into this deeper rest too.
‘That which is natural and afterward that which is spiritual’, (1 Cor 15:46). Paul defines the metaphor of Earth with man’s spirit and this verse employs possible double meanings of Heaven (as meaning either the universe or an abode of God-
God can only use the vocabulary of that day’s work to define our salvation process. Hence, the unusual categorisation of plants
God can only use the vocabulary of that day’s work to define our salvation process. Hence, the use of ‘lights’
God can only use the vocabulary of that day’s work to define our salvation process. Hence, the unusual categorisation of fish, birds and whales in day 5
God can only use the vocabulary of that day’s work to define our salvation process. Hence, the unusual categorisation of animals
God is ‘upon us’ when being saved (indwelling/acting on our spirit)
Recap:An overlap occurs within the KRM where the Earth may mean either God the Father or man’s base spirit (breathed into Adam or knitted to our bodies at conception by The Holy Spirit) or both simultaneously or literally just planet Earth. This concept itself hinting that our spirit ‘constituents’ are from God the Father. A copy and paste ‘in his image’. Everyone gets his spirit from God the Father. I suggest that when Earth is used and is referring to man in the metaphor it refers to either the whole of the ‘sea’ of every man’s spirit or each individual man’s spirit saved or not or both. The use of ‘earth’ to parallel man’s base spirit is very revealing.
When the term ‘upon the earth’ is used it seems in the literal to just embellish the text-
But, I again suggest this is slanted towards the metaphor and gives more meaning in the metaphor. Still, all double constructs testify to Jesus by defining before and a step wise path tosalvation:
(Genesis 1:11-
Two indwellings are described-
Part 2 in verse 12-
A new addition to original version Sept 2022
Key
=
Discussion of verses specifically slanted for the KRM
Colour Key
=
Discussion of verses specifically slanted for the KRM
Colour Key
=
Discussion of verses specifically slanted for the KRM
Key
=
Discussion of verses specifically slanted for the KRM
Key
=
Discussion of verses specifically slanted for the KRM
Key
=
Discussion of verses specifically slanted for the KRM
Key
=
Discussion of verses specifically slanted for the KRM
Key
=
Discussion of verses specifically slanted for the KRM
Key
=
Discussion of verses specifically slanted for the KRM
An extension of Paul the Apostle’s Metaphor in
KRM
Kosmos-
A prolonged metaphor within Genesis with multiple logical ‘‘typing’ of life on Earth with our ‘spirit man’ (living soul)
A stepwise path to salvation
Colour Key
=
Discussion of verses specifically slanted for the KRM
God can only use the vocabulary of that day’s work to define our salvation process. Hence, the unusual categorisation of animals and plants
God can only use the vocabulary of that day’s work to define our salvation process. Hence, the unusual categorisation of animals and plants
The plan for man’s redemption.
1. Fore-
2.The contract signed at the Abrahamic Covenant
3.The deal enacted at Christ’s Resurrection and the saved’s salvation
‘Sem’ translation options: name, fame, renown
‘Qara’
Translation:
Call, proclaim
cry, invite, renown
‘Adam’
Translation:
Man , men , Adam
‘Sem’ translation options: name, fame, renown
‘Qara’
Translation:
Call, proclaim
cry, invite, renown
‘Adam’
Translation:
Man , men , Adam
Genesis 2:18-
And Adam gave names to all cattle, and to the fowl of the air, and to every beast of the field; but for Adam there was not found an help meet for him
Man was made literally from the dust of the ground, so, in the KRM this parallels man’s spirit being remade/reborn from man’s original spirit as acted upon by The Holy Spirit. (‘dust of the ground’). The Holy Spirit presenting spiritual gifts/components of Himself and Jesus to man’s spirit and adding these to it. There seems to be two levels of similitude here:
Firstly, the beasts/fowl were formed also ‘from’ the ground and the wording is such that the beasts/fowl are a subset of the ‘living creatures’ that follows. Thus, suggesting they are (all) ‘nephesh chayyah’ or spirit containing animals. This should, I suggest, be considered with (Genesis 1:30) declaring that all nephesh chayyah life needs man for ‘meat’. And (Psalm 104:30). Note how fish are not included (a deliberate omission to satisfy the KRM or a lower life form?)
In the literal, I suggest Adam is not just calling the animals names but is proclaiming and justifying them in their roles and somehow Adam’s own spirit is involved and gives something in this process.The making and the naming going together. This is just touching on something Robin Bullock expands on very provocatively here.
Secondly in the KRM, there is much to consider. As the LORD God brought forth ‘beast/fowl to man to proclaim and name (or accept), so, in similitude in the KRM, the LORD God brought unto man’s spirit the gifts, spiritual components and works they symbolise and these are accepted by man.(So whatever the Holy Spirit has brought forth and added to man’s spirit)
Please note, the slanting in these verses. It starts off with the LORD God making from the ‘ground’ and bringing ‘beasts of the field’ and ‘fowls of the air’ to man, it then says man will give names to ‘every living creature’ (though man has not actually named them yet until verse 20). This ‘living creature’ is a different category to ‘beasts of the field’ and ‘fowls of the air’ (which however, in the literal does contain ‘beasts of the field’ and ‘fowls of the air’) but in the metaphor things are different. What does it mean in the metaphor?
Three times four things to save:To understand this, I would like to reconsider how these 4 categories keep repeating with slightly different terminology and perspectives. We have 4 of these categories all from slightly different viewpoints and with different slanting.
(Genesis 2:19 -
1.‘Every beast of the field’, 2.‘every fowl of the air’, 3.‘ ‘every living creature’ brought to 4.‘adam’
(Genesis 1:20 & 24)-
(Genesis 1 30)-
1.‘Every beast of the Earth’, 2.‘every fowl of the air’, 3.‘every thing that creepeth wherein there is life’ (the saved with indwellings) brought to 4.‘Every green herb’ (every man will be approached too?)
Please note, how in the KRM this sums up concisely what is required for salvation. The Holy Spirit’s works (2), bringing the indwelling ‘package’ (3), to man’s ‘base’ spirit (4), and with God the Father ‘works’ purposing this (1) . But there is also double meanings to these terms-
Genesis 1 20 & 24 is about designated roles of God the Father, the Holy Spirit and Jesus. Genesis 2:19-
Genesis 1:30 is all about man’s role in the salvation process-
It is always all about Jesus’ accomplishment 'They are those which testify of me’ John 5:39.
Back to (Genesis 2:19-
Now you will now instantly recognisable this as another example of the repeating double construct of before and after salvation! I suggest that as this is the tenth of them(at least ) than the concept cannot be a coincidence.
Genesis 21-
This is literal as God uses some of Adam’s ribs to make a bride, so, in similitude, as God does for life on planet Earth-
Numbers of and direction of indwellings -
Please note, man seems to be placed twice in the garden of Eden and hence, within the metaphor man’s spirit is also placed twice in the indwellings
Genesis 2 :8 …planted a garden eastward in Eden; and there he put the man whom he had formed… Genesis 2:15 … took the man, and put him into the garden of Eden to dress it and to keep it..
I suggest this references two indwellings of man’s spirit, the first is in Jesus as this seems to facilitate the waters coming forth (John 4:14) (John 7:38) (Eastward in Eden). I suggest the second refers to The Holy Spirit as we are are instructed to ‘keep and dress it’ which is consistent with us ‘keeping and dressing our own body ‘temple' (1 Corinthians 6:19-
Two indwellings of man’s spirit-
Creeping, moving and living (God can only use the vocabulary of the day)
Genesis 1:24-
To recap. in the KRM,all the above verses describe nephesh chayyah constituents (moving/creeping/living things in the literal) given to us by The Holy Spirit or God the Father. So, The Holy Spirit’s,and Jesus’ own nephesh chayyah being given to the saved and where some of these now reside-
Also, note how the waters brought forth ‘fowl’ but these become ‘winged fowl’ (gifts that can fly in the atmosphere-
Please note. as discussed earlier in this essay the ‘gifts/works/attributes that these terms ‘fowls of the air’ and ‘beasts of the Earth’ represent seem also to be defining origin too, the Holy Spirit and God the Father respectively and the term can thus, simultaneously refer to both as we use them as gifts given to us and The Holy Spirit’s or God the Father’s use of them. Either or both simultaneously.
Please note. The way the term ‘beasts of the Earth’ does not change as does the fowl/winged fowl/fowls of the air which maybe also be due to the fact that this is our original spirit and ‘package’ of gifts from God The Father.
Please note, when Genesis day 3 tells us that when waters are separated into land and waters then the waters become seas and. I suggest, this is the same change referenced in day 5-
Please note, a firmament was only termed a ‘heaven’ after an ‘it was so’ statement. So after salvation.(Gen 1:8) and there was no ‘it was good’ statement as described above because it is not ‘good’ until filled. (Heaven-
So, in addition to the selective use of ‘Kind’, there are further ways of metaphorically describing the situation leading to-
Awesome and Some!-
John 15:19-
John 3:16-
John 14:17-
John 8:12-
Would The Holy Spirit let the kosmos-
It is both confirmatory of future scripture, revelatory on the mechanics of our redemption and certainly opens up some previously less clear aspects of Genesis 1 and 2 .
Recap: It should be noted that the literal meaning of Genesis 2:5 describes a time ‘before’ plants were in the ground and ‘before’ herbs grew. So, on day 3 or before. Setting the time frame for the subsequent text to happen at this described ‘before’ time.The subsequent verses describe mist rising from the Earth BUT also God forming man from the dust, so these may, therefor,both logically be ‘before’ this on the third day. But we know Man was completed on day 6. It could mean that man was finished on day 6 but started on day 3. Robin Bullock here describes a three day process of making man by God forming a ‘cast’ of Himself and imparting some of God’s indwelling at that time, also establishing a blood/light covenant as well within man at the same time. Then, leaving him in the Earth for those three days and bringing him to life on day 6 by in-
This may be what (Revelation 3:14) is referring to Jesus as ‘the beginning of the creation of God’-
Salvation is purposed by the Father, accomplished by the Son, and applied by the Holy Spirit.[3]
‘It was so’….’it was good’
***This is what I will do…these are the changes it will bring***
***It used to be that way in the first creation…. ‘The new re-
***It used to be that way for our fallen spirit… ‘The new re-
On day 6, (Genesis 1:24-
The cattle and creeping thing (in the KRM-
This study of the use of ‘Kind’ confirms the first or ‘it was so’ statement to be applying to the condition of our fallen ‘living soul’ and the ‘it was good’ to what effect the commanded change has on it. At the same time, both statements apply literally-
The same approach can be applied to the other days (with the same provisos similarly highlighted above for when ‘it was good’ or ‘it was so’ are missing).
A Summary of the Repeating Double constructs; What God does for our salvation is in the first statement and The Effects on our living spirit/soul in the step wise path to salvation summarised in the Follow up Statement In the KRM:
Day 1. (Genesis 1:3-
Day 2-
Day 4. (Genesis 1:14-
The timeline of the KRM
Note, the way the timeline for salvation in the metaphor is in tact within Genesis 1
The History
The Roles Established
The summary of salvation
The detail of salvation
Three days later in the KRM
The same 3 day reverence to Christ’s 3 days in the grave is also consistent throughout the KRM,
Day 1-
Day 2-
Day 3-
What are the odds of this prolonged metaphor being in the right order by chance?
It only works with Gap Theory and I suggest is further proof of it. As if that was not enough, there are more sequential and coincident timings to follow in Genesis 2 also.
** God made two Earths in a specific sequence that paralleled man’s own creation, downfall and salvation and hence it all testifies to the Lord Jesus Christ.**
On the third day Jesus rose again bringing forth a new abundant eternal life, so, in continuity 3 days after death new life also begins on Earth .
On this third day of creation the Earth brings forth plant life as a basis (and food) for the higher life to follow. Three categories of plants are brought forth. These three categories can cover all plant life. All three also, metaphor the triune God’s works for man’s spirit.(And food for man’s spirit In conjunction with Genesis 1:29). See below. So, in similitude God the Father (earth) brings forth mankind, Jesus Christ and The Holy Spirit to redeem man’s spirit with each plant type representing one of these. In similitude and to emphasise again, no additional creating or making is needed to The Holy Spirit, Jesus and our spirit-
Grass and herbs are used in the Bible as a metaphor for man several times: Grass often likened to ‘flesh’ (Isaiah 40:6-
A ‘kosmos’ = What adorns tan Earth
A logical extension to the KRM
God has moved the biblical text to one of interactive governance as confirmed by the name change from ‘God’ to ‘LORD God’ and the same happens within the KRM. God seems to use other subtle name changes to further confirm this. This verse ties in with (Gen1:11-
Please note the way it is now herbs/plants of the ‘field’. I will show in the next passage how the Garden of Eden metaphors the full range of the ‘indwelling package’ in great detail. So, ‘of the field’ is any gift/work/attribute given but not within these indwelling gifts as they are not of the ‘garden’ but outside of the ‘garden‘ and so, ‘of the field’ (4). This will mean gifts from God the Father, or any gifts/works/attributes not to salvation yet.
Please note that also when the earth (our base spirit) has been acted upon by mist (the Holy Spirit) it becomes ‘ground’ and not just the ‘earth’. This term is used for the rest of Genesis 2, The ‘beasts of the earth’ and ‘beasts of the field’ are thus, synonymous but the latter describes greater intimacy.The above verses describe, within the KRM, that before any man can be saved (become a herb bearing seed-
What does rest mean?
God;s rest: ‘a state or place where God rules and manages his creation free from chaos and the disorder of sin and rebellion’ (Ed Jarret, Christanity.com)
As man must do with Eden so he must do with The Holy Spirit’s temple
Genesis 2:15 And the LORD God took the man, and put him into the garden of Eden to dress it and to keep it.
This is literal but also: as man is placed in Eden to dress and keep it, so,born again man is placed within/adjacent to the indwelling The Holy Spirit and man must respect this temple. (1 Cor 6:19)
Please note this is the second time God has ‘put man in the garden, more below.
Genesis 2:16-
This is literal but also: as man can eat of these fruits except for the tree of knowledge of good and evil or he will die then, so, man can freely enjoy the fruit of the his given spiritual gifts but not all, one specific rule must be followed or he will die-
Whales: mammals in the sea,
Mammals adapted to a different environment
Mammals that spout water
Mammals with varied and complicated communication systems
Mammals that alloparent
Mammals with complex working together/synergistic skills
A geological record of an organism abruptly and significantly modified enough to be termed ‘created’
Fascinating!
A creation to mimic the indwellings?
Gap proof? If the metaphor is true there must be a previous creation.
An extension of Paul the Apostle’s Metaphor in
KRM
Kosmos-
A prolonged metaphor within Genesis with logical ‘typing’ of life on Earth with our ‘spirit man’ (living soul)
Man was not in the first creation in Gap Theory; neither was any thing that was ‘created’ (bara) in the Genesis 6 day creation account-
The Long Life-
Modification of and missing ‘it was so’:
When God declared ‘Let light be’ then seemingly immediately light ‘was’. This immediate response seems almost an instant and ‘always was’ version of ‘ it was so’. Recap: God declares ‘it was so’ on days 2. 3 4, and 6 and perhaps is doing the same on day 1 but as light ‘types’ God, this may be alluding to the immutable and infinite God not changing. A kind of ‘I am’ statement for the KRM and an ‘I am’ statement for His glory light in the literal too. Things are different for day 5 as there is no initial ‘it was so’ on day 5 either-
I suggest
‘God said… God made’
=
God the Father said….The Word (Jesus) made
(Throughout Genesis 1)
Speculative parallels
Man, a 3-
*Extension*
KRM
Kosmos-
What God does for life on earth
He does for man’ s spirit
What God does for man
He does for man’ s spirit
*Extension*
KRM
Kosmos-
What God does for life on earth
He does for man’ s spirit
What God does for man
He does for man’ s spirit
*Extension*
KRM
Kosmos-
What God does for life on earth
He does for man’ s spirit
What God does for man
He does for man’ s spirit
*Extension*
KRM
Kosmos-
What God does for life on earth
He does for man’ s spirit
What God does for man
He does for man’ s spirit
Salvation is purposed by the Father, accomplished by the Son, and applied by the Holy Spirit. [3]
Please note,,as birds are now included (as made from dust and living creature), this may give more meaning to (Matthew 10:29) and confirm their nephesh chayyah status along with Genesis 1:30. Paralleling Adam made from dust also.
Please note,in the literal, the making of ‘fowl’ from ‘dust’ seems to contradict Genesis day 5 of winged fowl being ‘brought forth from the waters’ if that statement is looked upon as based on constituents/materials. But is consistent with Gap Theory as described on this site-
Please note,it does bring to mind Kerr’s revelation that to have authority over animals, man must be made of the same materials and design as they are. A duplication of our spirit/body constituents used for animals? Both man’s and animal’s spirits being ‘wrought’ from God’s own? (Psalm 139:15)., Both man’s and animal’s bodies therefor, being biologically similar too.
Please note also, and to repeat, the ‘size’ of our spirit may well be huge as one had at least 2000 demons in it in (Mark 5:13). Robin Bullock (here) describes not just Adam and Eve’s spirits being breathed into Adam but also a ‘knowledge’ of all nephesh chay animals and their spirits being breathed in at the same time (Genesis 2:7). He says our authority over the creation is dependant on faith. lKerr also says dominion is dependant on similarity of make up. (Maybe, this is all analogous to computer systems-
Please note, how the categories used in (Genesis 2:19-
*Extension*
KRM
Kosmos-
What God does for life on earth
He does for man’ s spirit
What God does for physical man
He does for man’ s spirit
*Extension*
KRM
Kosmos-
What God does for life on earth
He does for man’ s spirit
What God does for man
He does for man’ s spirit
*Extension*
KRM
Kosmos-
What God does for life on earth
He does for man’ s spirit
What God does for Adam
He does for man’ s spirit
Day 4: Let there be lights…..God made two great lights
Literally-
In the KRM-
Day 5: Let the waters bring forth abundantly (sharats)…God created from what the waters brought forth.
Literally-
In the KRM-
Day 6: Let the earth bring forth (yasa) various animals…..God made various animals.
Literally-
In the KRM-
Not one ‘yot or tittle..’ ? I suggest every word in Gen 1 is chosen with great care and skill.(As is the KJV). I have not heard of any other explanation for the different uses of the action and command verbs within Gen 1 that can be applied with such consistency and logic throughout it. All at the same time testifying to the work/individual roles of the Triune God in our salvation.
So. ‘brought forth’ supports Gap Theory. The earth and waters brought forth designs held within them, but by subtle use of different words. translated as brought forth, the KRM reveals the Lord Jesus Christ. God The Father and The Holy Spirit bring forth the constituents and Jesus’ works make or create our indwelling new spirit from them. I suggest this is all very strong evidence for both the KRM and Gap Theory.
Salvation is purposed by the Father, accomplished by the son and applied by The Holy Spirit (3)
Let there be,,.. and bring fourth…., Reveal the KRM and Gap Theory
Throughout Genesis, God initiates the day with a command, but these commands differ for each of the days.
Day 1: Let there be light. Light was… Why is light not created or made?
Day 2: Let there be a firmament…God made the firmament…Why did the sky not ‘bring the firmament forth’ as the waters or earth do? What is it made from? Why is it not created?
Day 3: Let the waters be gathered together and dry land appear.
Let the earth bring forth (dasa) various plants….The earth brought forth (yasa) various plants...Why brought forth? Why are plants not created or made? Why a different word for bring forth in the first (it was so) statement to the second ‘it was good’ statement?
Day 4: Let there be lights…..God made two great lights
Day 5: Let the waters bring forth abundantly (sharats)…God created from what the waters brought forth…Why a different word for brought forth than day 3?
Day 6: Let the earth bring forth (yasa) various animals…..God made various animals..Why the same word (yasa) for brought forth as the ‘it was good’ statement in day 3? Why in an ‘it was so’ statement now?
Genesis 2: 10 …and a river went out (yasa) of Eden and watered the garden and various other places
Why the different words? Within the literal meaning, the general feeling (especially with a young earth paradigm) is that different words are used to reflect different ‘things’ being made. For instance, as light is just electromagnetic radiation it can just be proclaimed ‘let be’. As a firmament is inanimate then just ‘let there be’ and ‘God made’ is used. When plants are made, as they are living, then the medium they are living in (earth) can just ‘brings them forth’, likewise fish, birds and animals from waters, waters and the earth respectively. It is often also said that maybe the constituents used to do the making are within the medium described, hence they can bring them fourth.This may well be the case for some of these in the literal but it does not answer all the questions posed above. But in Gap Theory and the KRM the reasons for each subtle detail are revealed. Also, Genesis Day 5: describes birds being brought forth by water but Genesis 2:19 describes every bird as being made from the earth-
Looking to use a consistent meaning for (yasa)? Gap Theory and the KRM provides it. All text is slanted towards the KRM.
If we look at Genesis 2: 10, in the KRM then we can see ‘yasa’ could be seen to mean ‘a direct outpouring from man’s spirit acting with God’s indwelling ‘package’ (‘water the garden’) and then leading to various different spiritual gifts. Man’s and God’s spirit working together and placed in man-
On day 3, in the post salvation ‘it was good’ statement the word ‘yasa’ is used and in the KRM this is also describing a direct outpouring but this time from The Holy Spirit and Jesus into man’s spirit leading to the indwelling ‘package-
Day 5 uses a different word ‘bring forth abundantly’ (sharats) and I suggest, this is synonymous with ‘yasa’ but also means in abundance too.This just leaves the use of ‘bring forth’ (dasa) in day 3. This word is only used twice in the Bible and the second use (Joel 2:22) is clearly referring to pastures ‘springing’ (forth plants). This is also consistent with the meaning in the KRM. God sending forth his son as a seed planted in Mary.(As well as literally the plants of day 3). But then the switch to ‘yasa’ for the second part-
Day 1: Let there be light. Light was.
Literally-
In the KRM-
Day 2: Let there be a firmament..God made the firmament.
Literally-
In the KRM-
Day 3: Let the waters be gathered together and dry land appear.
Literally-
In the KRM-
Let the earth bring forth (dasa) various plants….the earth brought forth (yasa)
Literally-
In the KRM-
A new addition to the original version Jan 2023
‘God said… God made’
=
God the Father said….The Word (Jesus) made
(Throughout Genesis 1)
the Holy Spirit’s Actions before and after Salvation day 5
The Holy Spirit's application of man’s salvation is described in tin day 5
Genesis 1:21 And God created great whales, and every living creature that moveth, which the waters brought forth abundantly, after their kind, and every winged fowl after his kind: and God saw that it was good.
And God blessed them, saying, Be fruitful, and multiply, and fill the waters in the seas, and let fowl multiply in the earth.
Please note:The waters brought forth, so within the KRM The Holy Spirit brings forth and presents to man and places inside saved man’s spirit: The great whales (indwellings) , every living creature that moveth (the other parts of the indwelling package,-
Please note the similarity between what man must do in the after salvation second part of the double construct and what The Holy Spirit will do. The overriding feeling is that this Is The Holy Spirit working through us a combined effort as well as just The Holy Spirit. Lets be clear The Holy Spirit is needed for salvation (John 3:5). Man on his own cannot convert people. The Holy Spirit can work on his own but often uses man for some of the process.So, to recap because of its importance ‘fowl of the air’ can also just mean The Holy Spirit, or his gifts in man (or angels) carrying out works. (In consistency with other parables too ) adding weight that the whole is carried out by The Holy Spirit sometimes aided by man.
A theological side issue-
The evening and the morning were the fifth day-
More on the Second Double Construct of Day 6-
Pre-
Gen 1:26 And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth (encompassing both ‘beast of the earth’ and ‘the living creature’-
Please note, the way the first part of this double construct defines everything that God the Father had brought forth in day 6. (Summarised below). With a use of post salvation ‘it was good’ vocabulary. (E.g. ‘things that creepeth’). But it is going to be applied to a pre-
Please note: All double constructs define before and after salvation, as does this as described above,, but very subtly. God is purposing our salvation from a before salvation standpoint and defining what man must avail himself of, so, all the listings are after salvation conditions. (As you will now know note from the terminology used!).
Please note, In the literal, this does not have an ‘it was so’ attached as it applies to man and man was not in the first creation.
Please note, In the KRM it does not have an ‘it was so’ attached to it as this is not applying to a pre-
Please note. Simultaneously, in the literal, these verses tell the story of man’s immense power and authority before the fall and some of which is subsequently lost.
The Post-
Genesis 1:28 And God blessed them, and God said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply,(an exact copy of the ‘be fruitful and multiply’ of verse 22) and replenish the earth, and subdue it: and have dominion over the fish of the sea (the ‘being used’ version of fill the waters in the seas of verse 22) and over the fowl of the air(the ‘being used’ version of ‘let fowl multiply in the earth’ of verse 22), and over every living thing that moveth upon the earth(An exact copy of the living thing that moveth post salvation statement of verse 21)
Please note the way that these categories now match what The Holy Spirit carries out on day 5. (Summarised below). Note the change from ‘creeping tings that creepeth’ to ‘living thing that moveth’. Synonyms for the same attributes from a different perspective-
Please note, In the KRM it does not have an ‘it was good’ attached to it as this is not applying to a post-
Please note. Simultaneously, in the literal, these verses tell the story of man’s immense power and authority before the fall and much of this is subsequently lost.
Please note: How ‘cattle’ and ‘whales’ are missing from the after salvation verse. Man does not need the indwelling after salvation to grow. He is already made in Christ’s image. He now requires The Holy Spirit. He already has the cattle or whales which are synonymous.
Please note: In the KRM, there is no use of the word ‘kind’ or ‘it was good’ as these descriptions have not been actioned yet and as God declares what man should do.
Jesus Accomplishes Man’s Salvation-
Every thing that is needed for salvation Jesus makes or creates-
Great whales (the indwellings from The Holy Spirit),every living creature that moveth (the other parts of the indwelling package from the Holy Spirit,-
Cattle (the indwellings, via the Holy Spirit), creeping things that creepeth (the other parts of the indwelling package via the Holy Spirit), beast of the earth (the original gifts/attributes/skills from God the Father now remade in Christ’s image) Verse 25. All of these are made by Jesus and so man is conformed to the image of Christ, (Romans 8:29). Jesus makes our salvation state. Jesus accomplished our salvation
There is much here so to summarise:
Day 6 is God The Father’s role proclaimed-
Day 5 is God the Father proclaiming The Holy Spirit’s role-
Everything Jesus makes/creates (God made/created) is Jesus accomplishing man’s salvation
Yellow text-
Blue text-
Day 5 Genesis 1:20-
And God created great whales(3)and every living creature that moveth (5)(6), which the waters brought forth abundantly, after their kind, and every winged fowl (2) (5), after his kind: and God saw that it was good.
And God blessed (1) them, saying, Be fruitful, and multiply (2), and fill the waters in the seas(1)(4), and let fowl multiply in the earth (3).
Day 6 Genesis 1:24-
And God made the beast of the earth (4) after his kind, and cattle (3) after their kind, and everything that creepeth (5) upon the earth after his kind: and God saw that it was good
Genesis 1 26 And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea (1), and over the fowl of the air (2), and over the cattle (3) and over all the earth (4) , and over everything that creepeth (5), upon the earth.
Gensis1:27 So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them
Genesis 1 28 And God blessed (1) them, and God said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply,(2)and replenish the earth(3), and subdue it: and have dominion over the fish of the sea(4), and over the fowl of the air(5), and over every living thing that moveth upon the earth (6).
I suggest that all of days 5 and 6 are slanted towards the KRM
The originally created planet Earth
Parallels
Adams’s pre-
spirit
The judged Earth
Parallels
Adams’s and every man’s
fallen state
Just Before Genesis Day 1
Just after Genesis Day 6
Literally and Figuratively and metaphorically
The Earth is lit from within by God’s Glory
Adams pre-
Light is pervasive with no shadowing
Adam’s spirit has no darkness or sin
2 Corinthians 4:6 For God, who commanded the light to shine out of darkness, hath shined in our hearts, to give the light of the knowledge of the glory of God in the face of Jesus Christ
The apostle Paul describes a metaphor likening God shining light (on a judged planet earth) to God shining light ‘in’ man’s heart. This is a consistent metaphors with those described above.
Man’s spirit is also compared to dry ground (Isaiah 44:3) Dry ground becoming an earth in (Genesis 1:10), and waters becoming seas.
The metaphor is established, I suggest:
Very simply, the Earth, the waters, the atmosphere and the water vapour shield represent man’s spirit given from God the Father-
The waters, the surface of the Earth (ground) and the atmosphere represent a location within man’s spirit for a changeable part of his spirit. Including within this location is a place for the placement of all the aspects of the indwellings from Jesus and The Holy Spirit. This location will also house and define God’s interaction with man’s spirit during the salvation process and after that. The Greek word used for what adorns the earth throughout the New Testament is Kosmos.
The whole Earth and atmosphere is thus man’s ‘spirit man’ in totality, his ‘nephesh chayyah’, his spirit inseparably joined to his living soul, his heart. Our Ruah.
The Summary
In addition to this, I aim to demonstrate how Genesis will define in Great detail:
As: God the Father alone let dry land/Earth appear then ‘Earth’ will represent God the Father. What the earth brings forth God the Father will also bring forth within a metaphoric second meaning.
As: God the Father alone let light be then light will represent God the Father. What light does for life on Earth God the Father will also do form man’s spirit within a metaphoric second meaning.
As The Holy Spirit hovers/broods on the waters, then what the waters bring forth for life on earth The Holy Spirit will bring forth for man’s spirit within a metaphoric second meaning.
As The Holy Spirit hovers/broods over the waters, so He is in the atmosphere then The Holy Spirit will be regarded as being within the atmosphere both within the metaphor (for what the atmosphere is representing within man’s spirit) and also, literally, within the atmosphere ON planet Earth as part of His omnipresence.
As Jesus alone made the firmament-
As Jesus alone made/created the Sun. Moon, stars, all life in the waters, on land and in the sky then what these do for life on Earth Jesus will do for man’s born again spirit within a metaphoric second meaning.
A beautiful elegance ‘in his image’ and ‘likeness’ (Genesis 1:26:27)
I am bout to desribe in more deatil how:
An overlap occurs where the Earth may mean God the Father or man’s base spirit or both-
An overlap occurs where the waters may mean The Holy Spirits or man’s waters or both -
An overlap occurs where ‘fowl of the air# may mean The Holy Spirits or man’s ‘fowl’ or both -
Everything Jesus made/created is according to ‘His kind’ the His referring to what is created/made in the literal but in the metaphor referring to the maker-
The Kosmos-
Now in much, much more detail:
Literally and Figuratively and metaphorically
The Judged Earth is in darkness
Adam’s and all men’s fallen spirit is in darkness.
The first Earth is watered from above.
Adam’s spirit receives spiritual blessings and spiritual waters from above only.
,
The type, volume and stature of life on the first Earth will metaphor the type, volume and stature of Adam’s huge pre-
The conditions on planet earth will parallel Adam’s pre-
All water is frozen on a flooded Earth
All man’s spiritual gifts and living waters are not able to flow and are ‘frozen’.
The first creation is judged with a flood from above only, the second creation is flooded from above and below. (Noah’s flood)
Adam is judged from above only by God the Father. All men will be eventually judged by God the Father and Jesus Christ-
All life on earth has perished.
Adam’s and man’s intended spiritual gifts and indwellings are gone. A spiritual death.
The conditions on the judged planet earth will parallel judged Adam’s/man’s fallen state.
Literally and Figuratively and metaphorically
The remade Earth is relit by Jesus’ works (making the sun). There is darkness and light
The remade ruah of saved man is relit by Jesus’ works (Jesus’ sacrifice). There is darkness and light.
The remade Earth is watered from water from the earth-
The remade ruah of saved man is ‘watered’ by Jesus’ works and the Holy Spirit’s application-
The type, numbers and stature of life on the remade Earth will metaphor the type, volume and stature of saved man’s spirit.
The conditions on the remade planet Earth will parallel saved man’s spirit.
Two or more different rests?
This page will regularly be updated so please press your refresh button
Day 5. See above.
Day 6. (Genesis 1:26-
But after salvation things change: We need to replenish our ‘tohu and bohu’ spirit (the Earth) but are no longer needing the gifts of a sacrificial Jesus-
Please note, the ‘it was so’ and ‘it was good’ qualifications are missing and I suggest this is because in the literal, this is dependant on man’s behaviour and man is not in the first creation, so these terms cannot apply as he was not there. In the literal this is dependant on man’s behaviour so again God cannot declare’ it was so or good’ because it is man’s choice. I think the word ‘subdue’ is referencing man conquering Satan and his operatives in both narratives.
Now to another double construct within this double construct!-
And God (plural) said (third person singular) Let us (plural-
Within the plain text literal, these verses testify to the Triune nature of God with subtle switches from singular to plural and also how ‘in our (plural) image’ is satisfied with the body, spirit and soul for Jesus, God the Father and The Holy Spirit-
In the KRM there is great subtlety and craft .
Please note God is defining from a before salvation standpoint what man should have at salvation in the equivalent of the ‘it was so’ statement and then how man should behave after salvation in the equivalent of the ‘it was good’. So, still before and after salvation statements of a double construct but subtlety different. (More below).
The first part of the double construct is defining a remade ‘spirit man’ also ‘in his image’ but this time man’s spirit being indwelt by Jesus and The Holy Spirit on our base spirit from God the Father . A whole new level of similarity but again declared from a before salvation viewpoint.
Please note the way ‘made’ is used-
The after salvation second part of the double construct-
Please Note, how there are two double construct statements in day 3 and day 6.
Please Note how these link together in the KRM only and not in the literal. The first statement in each case refers to our spiritual ‘constituents/make up’ before and after salvation and the second our ‘behaviour before and after salvation. This 3 day gap reveres Jesus role but also may be consistent with man being a 3 day creation which also reveres Jesus. More on day 6 below.
**Calvinism Refuted in Genesis all along**
The use of the word dominion in Genesis when applying to man’s dominion over accepting and using the indwellings and other Holy Spirit gifts completely refutes the Calvinistic viewpoint that this process is under God alone’s control. The salvation process-
More Examples
As The Triune God does for Life on Planet Earth (a kosmos), So, They do for the Redemption of Mankind’s Spirit
The Holy Spirit/Jesus and Eden ***.planted a garden..& made to Grow..*** (Genesis 2:8-
The Garden of Eden was seeded from plants from Heaven and not present on the Earth (and not newly created or made) l(Kat kerr). Genesis 2:8-
Planet Earth was a perfect creation and (in Gap Theory) falls into a death and darkness judgement. God remakes it with an added special new central creation of the Garden of Eden ‘planted and made to grow’ from heaven. Out of the belly of life on Earth, through Eden, flow rivers of water that give life to Eden and all around.
Humans fall into darkness and a spiritual death and they are reborn with indwellings from Jesus and The Holy Spirit, ‘planted and made to grow’ from Heaven which leads to living water proceeding out of the belly of man’s ‘spirit man’ which gives abundant life (and yields fruit) to those around.
Some properties of the living water given to man by The Holy Spirit may be revealed by the literal meaning of the names of the Rivers: Pison, Gihon, Hiddekel and Euphrates meaning overflowing, bursting forth, rapid and fruitful respectively.
I suspect, and it may also be, that the actions of the living waters are hinted at in the literal meaning of the places they reach (literal meanings in brackets).
Pison reaches or encircles Havilah (circle) where there is gold, bedelium (a fragrant resin) and onyx (precious metals and stones). Gihon encapsulates the whole of Kush (black). Hiddekel goes forward or east towards Ashshuwr (a step or an Assyrian}, Euphrates is only described with its name and it means fruitful (perhaps an indication of the prime attribute and the prime action of the Holy Spirit in this metaphor).
lKerr has revealed the importance of precious stones from within God as gifts for saved man and they seem to have some other value or function as well as aesthetics. (I believe the ‘lively stones’ of (1 Peter 2:5) may be a confirmation of this-
So, with the literal meaning of the destinies and paths of the Eden rivers in mind, it may be that the living water that proceeds out of men’s bellies is intimately related to precious stone ‘gifts’, encapsulates and separates us from darkness, will confront evil and is always fruitful?
So did Jesus hint at Gap Theory when he said that ‘scripture says living water will flow out of our bellies’ (John 7:38) because I can find no scripture that does explicitly say that? However, the metaphor with the rivers of Eden for living waters does describe it in detail. The metaphor only really works with Gap Theory as Eden is planted on a remade Earth and The Holy Spirit/Jesus are planted in a newly born again Christian. There are more references to living water in ‘Biblical Evidence of a Gap’ on this site and summarised here. But none are as clear a metaphor as the Eden ‘type’. Maybe Jesus said this just for the creation debate today today?
This again seems to represent a link between life on/in the surface of planet Earth and man’s spirit.
What God does for the life (a kosmos) on the born again Earth so He will do for man’s born again spirit (ruah). A prophetic seam throughout Genesis?
Mist from Above and Below-
Parallel stories; The Bible often deals with parallel stories or repeating themes-
Kerr’s Relevant Revelation:
Kerr describes the first created Earth as watered from mist descending from a water canopy encapsulated within a water vapour shield, watered form above. Two thirds (the bulk) of the water being in the canopy. l(Kat Kerr) A separated space giving out life giving water. I suggest, the water canopy is a metaphor for Heaven/God the Father. l(Kat Kerr) describes this mist as drenching the whole atmosphere and being un-
The second recreation is watered from mist from the Earth (Genesis 2:6) (and later after Noah’s flood from rain but all initially from the ground-
Similitude:
Man (Adam) is initially ‘lit’ in his spirit (made from light)-
Fallen man is relit by a new spirit from Jesus Christ on Earth and given gifts including eternal life but coming from Jesus Christ an earthly realm version of God-
John 4:14 (KJV) But whosoever drinketh of the water that I shall give him shall never thirst; but the water that I shall give him shall be in him a well of water springing up into everlasting life.
Jesus an earthly version of God on High
Floods on Earth and Judgment on Man
Parallel stories; The Bible often deals with parallel stories or repeating themes or types, once the revelation that the first creation was judged by bursting the water canopy by God the Father, l(Kat Kerr) , several parallel stories become apparent.
Earth
First creation-
Second Creation (or remake)-
(The fountains of the deep and widows of Heaven-
Man
Adam (and mankind) originally judged by God the Father from above. Genesis 3-
All mankind-
Jesus always an earthly version of God on High
Light, Man and God-
Parallel stories; The Bible often deals with parallel stories, repeating themes or types, once the revelation that the first creation was lit by the Glory of God and no Sun or Moon are present, several parallel stories appear: (I will show now Genesis 1 confirms this)
Light on the Earth-
The light that illuminates the original creation on planet Earth is directly from God-
It was pervasive and there was no shadowing or nighttime. It shines from within-
It originates in the spiritual world. And God is light. (1 John 1:5)
God’s Glory has unfathomable properties.
The Whole Earth falls and is judged and in darkness. (Genesis 1:2)
The second creation/renovation is lit by a new light (from the Sun, made by Jesus works. Genesis 1.
There is now darkness and light-
The light is a physical realm version of God’s Glory Light
Light still has mysterious properties. (E.g. duality)
Light in man’s spirit and soul-
Adam had his spirit (made of light-
God lights this spirit from within by his presence and man shines from this.
Adam’s spirit radiates light.
God is in the spiritual world.(2 Corinthians 4:6) (Psalm 18:28 ) (Proverbs 6:23)
Then Adam/mankind falls and is judged and his spirit is in darkness.
The regenerated saved man is lit by a new light from an earthly manifestation of God in Jesus Christ. (John 8:12). Lit by Jesus’ works..
There is darkness and light as man struggles.
The light of Jesus is a physical realm version of God’s Light
Jesus is the light of the world and an earthly physical realm version of ‘God is Light’
Both God and Jesus remain beyond understanding.
(John 1:4 ) (John 8:12) (1 John 1:7)
Jesus: an earthly version of God on High
This page is extracted from a book entitled
Double Constructs and The Kosmos Ruah Metaphor
The book will give new details on many of the ideas presented on this site and especially on this page and is written from a slightly different perspective in order to flow easier. Available soon.
3
Genesis 1:1
Genesis 1:2
Genesis 1:3-
A Prophetic Thread
The Genesis 6 days describing the roles of each of the Triune God in the remaking of life on earth and simultaneously prophesying their roles in the salvation of man.
Every verse-
The new earth
paralleling all saved men’s spirit since c 33 AD
***God is telling us two simultaneous stories in Genesis 1 and 2. Each and every word having at first a literal physical realm meaning and then, in similitude, a spiritual one.***
(Genesis 1&2-
This may all seem a little contrived to start with but bear with me as all ‘typing’ will, by their consistent application link together , confirm each other and testify to the Lord Jesus Christ. Strangely, the Bible’s use of ‘it was so’, ‘it was good’ and especially ‘kinds’ will, I suggest, absolutely confirm this metaphor by a way you will not have imagined before.
The role of each member of the Trinity in the Genesis 6 day creation account is a prolonged metaphor with additional multiple logical ‘typing’ which describes their future roles in man’s redemption and also their future indwelling relationships. .The whole text is a thing of astonishing beauty and subtle craft. When studied, as well as having a literal meaning, Genesis 1 and 2, almost appear, at least sometimes, to have the text written more with the metaphor in mind rather than the literal.
In Genesis 1, The Holy Spirit is within the atmosphere (‘hovering’), so, in similitude the atmosphere (air) describes The Holy Spirit’s location within the redeemed spirit-
Jesus also plays an additional role in establishing our atmosphere (by making the firmament) and additionally, makes life in the atmosphere, sea and on land. So, what the atmosphere, firmament and life in the atmosphere, sea and on land does in recreating life on Earth ‘type’ what Jesus does for man’s redeemed spirit.
Jesus makes animate life on earth = Jesus accomplishes all aspects of salvation they symbolise.
Everything Jesus makes will represent something in man’s spirit. Aspects of the nature of man’s relationship with Jesus are also revealed in the relationship between the firmament/life in the atmosphere/on land and the sea and the newly created life on Earth.
(Genesis 1:20) describes our atmosphere as Heaven (samayin). Heaven (samayim-
*******The Prolonged Kosmos-
As the Triune God does to Re-
So, They do To Redeem Mankind’s Spirit and Soul (man’s living soul-
(This only works with Gap Theory)
(One of the longest running, metaphors,with multiple logical ‘typing’ in the entire Bible? (Almost 2 chapters and also with ties to the phrase ‘The Foundation of the World’, the use of ‘kosmos’ and ‘aion’)
Genesis 1:2 ..And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters.
The whole of Genesis 1 and 2 is chronological both literally and within the metaphor and as Genesis starts with The Holy Spirit brooding on the judged waters, so, man’s salvation starts with The Holy Spirit working/brooding on us, on our ‘waters’-
Day 1:What God does for a desolate life on Earth, He Does for the fallen spirit of man .
Genesis 1:3-
2 Corinthians 4:6
For God, who commanded the light to shine out of darkness, hath shined in our hearts, to give the light of the knowledge of the glory of God in the face of Jesus Christ.
***So, Paul the apostle knew of the parallelism between Genesis 1:3 and our salvation process but is the metaphor extendible? Yes it is, I suggest, very, very much so, every single word and all to be described here !***
This is literal but also: as God shines light onto the surface of Earth (thus, establishing the metaphor for man’s spirit with earth)-
God the Father alone spoke.-
This light of day 1 is from the spiritual dimension, three days later, the light of day 4 will be from the physical dimension (the Sun and Moon), in similitude, the light for man’s spirit is initially from God, after salvation from Christ. Christ’s 3 days in the grave being reverenced.
Genesis 1:5 ‘And God called the light Day, and the darkness he called Night. And the evening (ereb) and the morning (boqer) were the first day. (Yom).
Much has been written about the meaning and time span of these ‘days’. I take the position that they mean a literal 24 hour day and also possibly a declining entropy statement. There is, however, a clear meaning within established translations that ties in with the KRM: The first part of the verse links darkness (evil) with night and light (good) with day. Using this the actual ‘day’ sentence can thus, within established meanings (opposite) be translated: ‘And the evening (night) and the morning (coming daylight) were the first day’. Combining the two, then ‘darkness and coming light’ would seem to be a valid translation. This corresponds with KRM describing our stepwise path to salvation from darkness and into the light for each and every day.
‘The evening and the morning were the first day’-
‘That which is natural and afterward that which is spiritual’, (1 Corinthians 15:46).
Genesis tells us two stories simultaneously-
The Holy Spirit brooded, God spoke and Jesus made.
Salvation is purposed by the Father (God said), accomplished by the Son (all that God made/created), and applied by the Holy Spirit (brooded, waters ) [3]
‘The evening and the morning were the second day’-
Day 3:What God does to renew life on the judged Earth He will do to renew man’s fallen spirit
Genesis 1:10:And God called the dry land Earth; and the gathering together of the waters called he Seas: and God saw that it was good.
This is literal but also: as God himself makes the canvas for life on Earth (God says… God made/created …. meaning God The Father spoke… Jesus made…but ‘God made’ is missing from this text-
Please note the waters on Earth are seas in Genesis 1:10 and not in Genesis 1:9-
Genesis 1:11-
This is a literal event, the Earth brings forth designs held there (shadows/design from a previous creation). Please note. to repeat: no additional ‘creating’ or ‘making’ is described, (as there is no repeating ‘God made’ confirming the same command actioned, but we know Jesus made everything, why is it omitted?). The Earth ‘types’ God the Father, so this is just God the Father bringing forth within the metaphor. But also:
(Genesis 1:30 ) (Genesis 1:31)
Verse 30 describes things in reverse and what these gifts/works now need to work on. ‘Beasts of the Earth’ , ‘fowl of the air’ and ‘creeping thing’. Note the finishing ‘it was so’ statement confirming this is pre-