The Bible Defines Organisms Made ‘After their kind’ (miyn) or Created Kind ‘baramiyn’
‘Kinds’-
Does ‘after their kind’ mean one of the options within that kind? Or does it mean these organisms are made as the whole kind with potential to become anything within that kind thus hinting at a huge genetic possibility. A genetic multi capability from a generic template start. Can ‘kinds’ produce other breakaway ‘kinds’?
If God was describing a Pekinese dog would He declare it made after its kind and the kind being dogs? God would clearly say it for the original dog or wolf (they cannot seem to make their mind up what the origin is) but also, I suggest, He would say it for any organism that is ‘pure’ bred from that kind. Herons, vultures, ravens, locusts are all defined as after their kind here. I suspect that ravens originate from (or are the originator of ) a kind that also produces all the crow family: crows, jays etc which confirms this. After their kind means God is defining them as His separated and categorised design. I suggest kind just means the organism cannot ‘go back’ to a more basic level, and when it can only breed within its own kind, the kind is established.
So God made organisms after (like) this abstract idea of a kind composing of a prodigious ability for variation within that kind. With this definition in mind, I believe God does not ‘do the same’ but many of his creations change (and this is what evolutionists study.) They are just studying an in-
Some speculate that there was a barometric change after Noah’s flood that led to these pre-
Three of a Kind? I believe also that the Triune God is also a ‘kind’ and Genesis 1 confirms this, intrigued? see here